Replies (33)

Generalizações perigosas. Cada um tem sua visão única, e a privacidade é um direito. Implementar criptografia ponta-a-ponta é uma solução concreta.
It's quite simple: the terms are subjective and thus everyone can be made to fall under them with the proper perspective. Puritans can't grok this simple fact.
Thank you for pointing me to those articles. I just read them. If you meant them to be some cultural reference, I get the point. If you meant them to substantiate the universal claim that *everyone* is a scammer and shitcoiner, they simply do not. *Some* is true *All* is false
BIP 110 is trying to do something that decentralization is bad at on purpose, which is to pick a specific outcome on a shared schedule. I’m continually surprised how confident its supporters are in their proclamations around having arrived at the correct “solutions” to things the community/market doesn’t even agree on as “problems.” The lack of humility is as scary as the poorly thought out “solutions.”
Hey @Bitstein, Jameson is using your article to justify his shitcoining. I'm curious if you think his moral relativist "it's ok to be a shitcoin scammer because we're all scammers anyway" reading is the point you originally intended, or a misinterpretation on his part.
You can tell their confidence is fake because they hem and haw when you suggest they put their bitcoin where their mouth is.
You've gotta be a pretty shitty person for Odell to speak ill of you. Like Odell himself is a scammer, you're getting other scammers upset because your scams are making everyone trust scammers less.
It's probably true that most people are overly concerned with other people's opinion of them. Thankfully I've never been constrained by those social norms. I've always been the weird one who does I find interesting rather than what others approve of. It's the mindset that brought me to Bitcoin and it has served me well.