This is just semantics. You could make that argument about anything depending on your definition of "ownership." According to Merriam-Webster... "Own" - To have or hold as property. - To have power or mastery over. How do you reconcile Bitcoin's solution for property rights and self-sovereignty when you apparently can't own the property?

Exactly. Well explained. I came from a Murray Rothbard point of view myself to ask some (I hoped) challenging questions, but clearly I missed what I aimed for 😂👊