Replies (21)

Default avatar
npub1u57e...l3fp 1 year ago
All fine so far. No problem at all. Would love to see more languages like german, italian or french to onboard some european boomers. But over all I like the app a lot 👍
1 replies ↓
OpenSecret's avatar
OpenSecret OpenSecret@primal.net 1 year ago
We've got a few translations over the last month or two, lots of good work being done to make it easier to contribute and support this. If you know anyone that does translations, please point them our way!
Default avatar
npub1t9w2...r5d8 1 year ago
I'm assuming he knows that the node runs on the device and believes there are other factors that make it functionally custodial?
Matt's avatar
Matt matt@gitcitadel.com 1 year ago
It may be more convenient and therefore more difficult to "do some serious moves to recover that node," but doesn't the ability to make the moves make it technically self-custody? Self-custody doesn't necessarily mean technically simple or easy. Am I misunderstanding your point?
1 replies ↓
Matt's avatar
Matt matt@gitcitadel.com 1 year ago
As far as I can tell, those servers are just a convenient way for your own node to communicate with the network. It doesn't appear that the user is using on of their nodes. I don't see how that translates to Mutiny having custody. All they seem to be doing is offering a server for convenience. Of course setting up your own server is more complicated, but that doesn't mean you don't custody the funds. What am I missing?
1 replies ↓
DarthCoin ₿⚡️'s avatar
DarthCoin ₿⚡️ darthcoin@stacker.news 1 year ago
Yes, you control the keys of that node. But only that. If the domain / server where it reside the whole software, goes busted or just shut down, you practically have the funds blocked, until you do a complex recovery. That is not a real "self-custody". Is just partial. Is better to inform well users and do not lie to them with fancy words just to gather more users.
2 replies ↓
Matt's avatar
Matt matt@gitcitadel.com 1 year ago
I don't want them to do shit. I'm just pointing out that I don't see how you go from that issue to Mutiny being a custodian of funds. They are running a communication domain. How does that equate to having control of funds? The node is already running on the user's device, not a Mutiny device. Your claims are inaccurate and you're doubling down instead of admitting it.
1 replies ↓
Matt's avatar
Matt matt@gitcitadel.com 1 year ago
The phone or whatever is running the full node. Mutiny is simply setting it up for you and providing a communication server if you want to use it. That isn't the same thing as Mutiny running the node on their own servers.
Matt's avatar
Matt matt@gitcitadel.com 1 year ago
You still haven't demonstrated how the funds are in the custody of anyone other than the user, so I'm ending our talk. You're wasting my time.
Joda's avatar
Joda joda@nostrplebs.com 1 year ago
Still having the issue where Mutiny fails sending to lightning addresses with capital letters, rather than fixing them. image
↑