Replies (11)

I'm assuming he knows that the node runs on the device and believes there are other factors that make it functionally custodial?
As far as I can tell, those servers are just a convenient way for your own node to communicate with the network. It doesn't appear that the user is using on of their nodes. I don't see how that translates to Mutiny having custody. All they seem to be doing is offering a server for convenience. Of course setting up your own server is more complicated, but that doesn't mean you don't custody the funds. What am I missing?
The phone or whatever is running the full node. Mutiny is simply setting it up for you and providing a communication server if you want to use it. That isn't the same thing as Mutiny running the node on their own servers.
You still haven't demonstrated how the funds are in the custody of anyone other than the user, so I'm ending our talk. You're wasting my time.
Still having the issue where Mutiny fails sending to lightning addresses with capital letters, rather than fixing them. image