BIP-444 should be only about placing op_return limits on a consensus level, it would be less messy and would probably get consensus. Down the road other data restrictions could be proposed more carefully.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
It doesn’t matter to me what exactly is in BIP-444. The point is to get it underway quickly so the market can start pricing the two competing chains’ coins.
There's alway the option of the bip not going forward wich is probably the best.
Bip-444 should just be ignored. If one wanted to spam the chain with csam one could do it without anyone’s permission using fake pubkeys. There is nothing that this bip does that can stop that.
This is not true in the same way as OP_RETURN and that's literally the whole point of contention. This has been stated and refuted nearly millions of times at this point.