It’s honestly pretty simple, so I don’t get why people are arguing about it. Being and experience are basically art. Art is always subjective and open to interpretation, and being works the same way. If you’re against subjective interpretation, you’re basically against free will. Some of you are trying to claim there are objective rules for what makes life meaningful or fulfilling, but we’re not machines. We’re human with endless forms of imagination, creativity and perspective. You could even call it a kind of quantum mind. In quantum physics there’s the no-cloning theorem, meaning information can’t be perfectly copied. Our experience is the same, it can’t be duplicated. Trying to force some predetermined definition of what life “ "should" mean goes against how the universe even works. Instead of arguing nonstop, maybe just appreciate the fact that we get to choose. The truth doesn’t need anyone to agree with it. Bullshit does.

Replies (1)

If all meaning is subjective, then your claim that “we get to choose” is meaningless too. Why should I value choice or your interpretation over mine? You just said it’s all art. You’re borrowing from objective truth (free will matters, truth exists, the universe “works” a certain way) while denying objective truth exists. That’s not quantum physics. The moment you said “the truth doesn’t need anyone to agree with it,” you abandoned relativism. You admitted there’s a standard outside subjective interpretation. Either truth is objective and your quantum poetry is irrelevant, or truth is subjective and you have no grounds to tell anyone they’re wrong, including me. You’re not arguing for freedom. You’re arguing for a world where nothing means anything