If all meaning is subjective, then your claim that “we get to choose” is meaningless too. Why should I value choice or your interpretation over mine? You just said it’s all art. You’re borrowing from objective truth (free will matters, truth exists, the universe “works” a certain way) while denying objective truth exists. That’s not quantum physics. The moment you said “the truth doesn’t need anyone to agree with it,” you abandoned relativism. You admitted there’s a standard outside subjective interpretation. Either truth is objective and your quantum poetry is irrelevant, or truth is subjective and you have no grounds to tell anyone they’re wrong, including me. You’re not arguing for freedom. You’re arguing for a world where nothing means anything

Replies (2)

Strawman logical fallacy. You're misrepresenting his position then attacking that misrepresentation. He did not deny that objective truth exists. He said "Some of you are trying to claim there are objective rules for what makes life meaningful or fulfilling". That's not the same thing. You're the one trying to impose objective things into a conversation that is inherently subjective.