There you have it. Knots 20250903 is now the most common node version.
Login to reply
Replies (45)
The plebs have spoken
Core proponents assured us this wouldn’t happen. Couldn’t happen. That your node doesn’t matter. It does.
Core v30 proponents assured us this wouldn’t happen. Couldn’t happen. That your node doesn’t matter. It does.
View quoted note →
!!!!
View quoted note →
Amazing. It’s surprising to me that there are only 3,000 people out there saving the world. Out of 8 billion.
It kinda looks like core is the most common
Core is clearly the most common with a count of around 14’000 vs 5’000 knots.
Yes, if you add up all Core versions and all Knots versions. But the single most common version is Knots 20250903.
The plebs have spoken developers
View quoted note →
Where did this come from. How can I monitor this?
Wow!!!! Nice!
It's not "knots vs core" it is core-v30 vs everything else.
Core-v30 is the one upcoming that is making the change.
All current mainline nodes use an op_return filter.
this is the first time in bitcoin's history that an alternative client reached 20%. This exceeds the 15% of the UASF.
Basic math says that 20% a majority is not
All I see is 0% Core v30
Hey man i see you are Swiss. Do you have some feedback on why 50.30% of Sesia voted yes to the digital ID?
As an external I thought you guys would have surely voted no…
Most common version, NOT to be confused with most common software, …which is still core.
@Des Imoto マキシ There are far more nodes like mine that run Bitcoin anonymously and are not tracked in these numbers. My guess is that the percentage of anonymous Knots vs anonymous Core node runners is somewhat similar to the public node figures. But you are only able to see the tip of the iceberg here. 😉
And you wonder whats wrong with Bitcoin and the community 😂
No real feedback other than it was a referendum, which is good, and a very close call.
At least it was decided the right way.
I think this is a perspective where you perhaps have not extrapolated deeply enough. Some people run older nodes of core because they choose to for very specific reasons.
Core30 sucks
The implementation I run has less than 5%.
View quoted note →
A big story. Something I am guilty of not paying enough attention to
I’ve been working on the assumption that fucking with consensus is really hard
This proves that
Plenty of incentive aligned legends out there fighting my corner
Core 30 specifically? Yes I think it’s a bad idea rn.
Not for long it appears
Lots of salty tears and cope in the comments 😂
That’s the real ATH.
View quoted note →
Ah so you are also in favour of digital ID, my bad then
I would have probably voted against
Sorry then I misunderstood when you said “at least it was decided the right way”, I get now you were referring to the referendum
Our nodes matter! Keep up the sprit brothers. Bitcoin is money, let's use it like that and be stewards of the networks.
Where is the data from? Can you trust the statistics? I mean, how many nodes are using tor?
Core is not dying
Would it be a success if knots were 100% of nodes?
Yes
No.
You need100% Miners to filter
Only temporarily. Even Luke supports multiple well maintained implementations. Right now there’s only one; Knots.
If the network was 100% Knots and miners continued to include spam they would be risking being rugged and going bankrupt.
Don’t forget:
uaspoof=1
