Nobody can stop them from doing what they are doing but if you are a user of primal how can you trust what you see? Advocating for and or using primal is cringe af.

Is it the same argument for Microsoft, Google, Apple, AOL, Dropbox, hosting providers, image hosts? If so, I respect you for holding ground. But the scale of the issue needs to be agreed. They should be responsible for conceding the tradeoff involves a sacrifice of certainty, sovereignty, debatably, they are doing that already. Users should be aware of the sacrifice. Debatably you need to do what you are doing because their actions aren't sufficient to ensure that they are. On the other side, you should be responsible for conceding that you are in the minority opinion. But arguing a principled position. It should be Agreed by both sides that your position is technically right! Your argument should be able to be focused on the fact that you believe those trade offs to be misguided. And the minority position should have more respect than it does. All ideas begin there. Then we can decide how cringe that is. I mean watching CNN at the airport is one thing but subscribing to Don lemon's fit bit is something else.