Unfortunately this is not always the case
Super Testnet's avatar Super Testnet
I want to congratulate @npub1yn84...xgfl for finding an LN transaction and posting it Let's see info he learned: - sender? Himself -- assuming he sent from a self-custodial wallet, he even knows the address or channel of the sender, wow! - recipient? He knows the recipient's communication pubkey, node, and node name -- though not learn the address or channel that received the money - Amount? 69 sats - Fee? less than 1 sat That's a lot of info! More than I'd get from analyzing a monero transaction. Reading this back, it sounds sarcastic; it's not, I am being genuine: this really is more info than I'd get from analyzing a monero transaction, and it motivates me to work on making LN better. Thanks Kevin!
View quoted note →

Replies (4)

Super Testnet's avatar
Super Testnet 10 months ago
it occurred to me afterward that I would actually get *more* info from analyzing a monero transaction *if* -- like him -- I was the sender sender -- the sender of a monero payment obviously knows who the sender is recipient -- the sender of a monero transaction also knows which of the recipient's addresses got the money, whereas in LN, the channel that received the money is hidden from the sender amount -- the sender of a monero transaction obviously knows what amount he sent fee -- the sender of a monero transaction obviously knows what fee he paid So I was wrong before when I said Kevin learned more from analyzing his own LN transaction than I would learn by analyzing a monero transaction that I myself made. He actually learned less.
โ†‘