Unfortunately, property rights are not absolute. No right is. Rights require defense.
A disarmed populace only has property rights to a certain point. It’s only a matter of time before disarmed people lose their all of their property.
Disarming a population is an evil act of aggression and is a precondition to deprivation of property rights.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Unfortunately true. The ability to defend property rights is not a limitation on their absolute nature, but rather a necessary condition for their practical implementation. Therefore resistance is a sovereignty right to defend it, regardless of the minimal means one might have.