Writing up Q&As, which includes a "Why DNN and not XYZ?" image Also made a comparison table (probably need to update it more) image And considering what I wrote before in terms of new benefits I realized, and the below text you might read, I'll also add another doc mentioning use-cases/applications (since there's a lot). Side note: I also just realized (so I need to update the doc with this) that assuming DNN becomes mainstream, a search engine based on it is possible, without needing websites to put special code in their website to be indexed by a system, resulting in the ability for anyone to create a competing search engine without relying on historical indexing of a single entity. What this means: Let's assume DNN was there from the start, and Google did it's thing and became the best search engine, though they started censoring their search results and modifying it to fit their and others' needs, corruption, etc (all of which happened), another search engine would appear, have almost all the same data, and doesn't do BS actions/behaviour like we see with Google, and people start using it without any friction, resulting in an immediate competitive strike, which ultimately results in a healthier system and everyone benefits. Side note, the second coming: sudo pacman -S vlc? sudo yay -S vlc? nah, let's go with sudo nabtaAbove -S vlc sudo nabobZoo -S vlc etc Gist: nostr based, user based, creation of list of repos to install shit on your linux) That's be great to have one day =3

Replies (5)

What you're doing is amazing, maybe as much as bitcoin itself. I hope DNN becomes standard so when I'm older I can brag "I used to talk with Freakoverse himself on nostr, the guy who made internet free of corporation control" ๐Ÿ˜†
Thnx for the share. I like the idea of this project / it's interesting, since there's no currency and it's just proof of work. Aside from that, the gist: Doesn't utilize Bitcoin and uses its own custom chain (i guess think namecoin but without the link to bitcoin and no currency), no permission required (good), no bidding auction (good, but has a first-come-first-served flow), scarce names/IDs (in the eyes of DNN, not good), names are transferable i think (good or bad, depends on the individual), relias on iana/IPs like the rest, no financial benefits to third-parties (good), one unique acquisition per spend (keeping in mind that 'spend' is processing power and not money), medium operational complexity (requires people to run a node to explore its chain and get a domain and update records, not sure if they have a 'website' or plans for adoptions to make it easy for people), short domain name acquisition time (good).
โ†‘