> A lot of content seems optimized to generate anxiety Damn, I still remember how watching Pink Panther was an enormously painful experience in my childhood.

It looks like we're lacking a NIP that restricts markdown to a certain scope. And nobody knows for sure what the restrictions would be adequate. #devstr View quoted note →

It took me a while to process the experience and properly articulate the last sections of the article. And it may keep unpacking. I must admit I've rarely participated as a peacemaker in whatever interpersonal conflicts in my life. I was usually more on aggressive side. Somehow I was lucky to be able to stay away from performing aggression in public online spaces. Love the toughest conflicts; they are teachers. Love your opponent without losing yourself, if you still believe they are an opponent at all. "If you hate a person, then you're defeated by them." (c) *widely attributed to* Confucius Don't expect they will love you back, of course; do it for your own growth. Love is more than a naive, hippie-sh thing. #grownostr #shadowwork #love View quoted note →

Keep nostr weird. And positive. #grownostr View article →

Especially if you are dyslexic, which book narration software do you prefer? I'd like something FOSS for GNU/Linux that can ideally do well - reading with expression - speedup up to ~4x - properly parse weird doc structure with footers/headers/columns/etc. - (in a non-disruptive way) notify when a related picture becomes visible - the more supported formats, the better Easier to vibe code it already? Nothing worked for me in the past. I keep reading manually when I have capacity. Still a torture to me. #asknostr

I find this default behavior in White Noise slightly disturbing:

GitHub

White Noise encourages using non-auth relays by default · Issue #528 · marmot-protocol/whitenoise

https://nostr.doctor reports this for a newly created account: I believe Marmot clients should use NIP-42 auth-only relays whenever possible and sh...

Not sure why there are not auth-only relays. NIP-42 auth per session doesn't work yet, or/and properly working NIP-42 relays are not really that common yet? Forward secrecy doesn't really work when NIP-42 is not a requirement for NIP-59 gift wraps: either you or your buddy may expose them with these default relays for example. Similar issue with the NIP-46 signers: private events exposed in the wild

GitHub

Add `--auth` for `nak bunker` · Issue #116 · fiatjaf/nak

That would be awesome if the bunker was compatible with auth-only relays, which could hide kind 24133 events from non-authorized users. Is it possi...

If you're building a signer, please consider testing/making it compatible with NIP-42 relays and optionally making it show a warning if it's connected over a non-auth relay (or specifically a relay that exposes kind 24133 events). #devstr #privacy #whitenoise