i oppose it because i think we need a plain schnorr signature based, hash shielded monetary transaction and BIP110 makes that a bureaucratic mess with the policy of excluding "unknown" witness programs. the only option that leaves for adding such a UTXO type is a hardfork. fork bitcoin core, add the witness program for a plain schnorr output type, set bip-110 antispam limits as defaults, and delete (deprecate) taproot. big bitcoin can get fucked. and as far as i'm concerned, BIP-110 is controlled opposition. just research how the protocol works. we could be deprecating taproot today, already, refusing to carry their transactions. and it's about taproot. taproot is the wedge they are using to push bitcoin into becoming ethereum. there's nothing stopping us doing this. only laziness and ignorance. people have been apathetic and complacent about the big bitcoin companies like blockstream serving other masters. how do you expect them to not laugh at us with our sovereign ethics if we don't act like sovereigns.