You started misguiding again without going into nuances. Chainsplits created by contentious soft forks are not meant to be permanent. On permanent chainsplits like bcash, sure. Not the case here. I am not an OG like yourself but as far as I know, never in the history of Bitcoin has any exchange offered old coin and SF coin in the event of a SF. This one will be contentious and it might happen, but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice. The most frustrating part about your recent tweets/comments related to core vs knots debate (& BIP 444) is 80IQ like myself gets these nuances but you don't. I think you get the nuances too but since you have become CORECUCK, you just chose to not get into nuances.

Replies (9)

--> "but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice" How does it die? It wont be obvious which one of the chains is *winning* without assigning real work/value to it. Hash rate driven by the market. It dies by the market deciding which chain is more valuable.
Retweeting this to show Nostr plebs how @ODELL has been misguiding plebs on BIP110 (aka BIP444) Successful activation of BIP110 will significantly damage the reputation of not just @ODELL but also @OpenSats and @TEN31. Whoever sells his soul to fiat mafias, gay VCs, spammers/scammers and coretards CANNOT BE SPARED. View quoted note →