Replies (25)

There is an ironic buildup of hostility toward women because of their susceptibility to social influence and propaganda. About the only positive spin happening for women now is sports and trannies
Kat's avatar
Kat 4 days ago
I've never felt more hated and less cared for by society than when I was pregnant/a new mother. Make of that what you will.
Kat's avatar
Kat 4 days ago
Wtf lol, I'm not a bot. You can even check me out on @SimplyNostr 😂 I repost to help boost posts and projects I care about 🫶
yeah, that was my read. not everyone is a content creator. boosters are important too. lurkers are boring but they are the majority unfortunately.
The world has been hostile towards women (birthing children) for centuries. Why are you noticing this now? To be clear, teaching women their only purpose in life is to get pregnant is also hostile. Feel free to block me. 🤗
It's funny how there's a mainstream concensus in the west can't define a woman unless it's to imply that men are cunts, then they are laser focused, then back to having no idea what a woman is in time for the next NGO meeting.
Kat's avatar
Kat 4 days ago
It's my LinkedIn PFP because I'm a mum and have no other pictures of myself without my kid 😂
Kat's avatar
Kat 4 days ago
Apology accepted 🤝
which camera did you use? i used to have a phone that was prone to doing that whole narrow depth of field thing with the cheesy blurred background. or did someone with an SLR do it with narrow aperture or something? i'm not trying to be nosey, it just is a style that has been overdone in recent years. worse than just stills, a lot of movies have started using narrow depth of field and it weakens the sense of realism, and they do it to lower costs because a convincing back-story world behind the actors is more expensive. i saw a good youtube video a few months back discussing how this trend with narrow depth of field shots in movies reduces the sense of realism, of the things you can look at that aren't directly in the story.
it's my personal, aesthetics opinion, that narrow depth of field (sharp focus on a subject, blur on everything much outside of the region around the subject) belongs only in macro photographs. it just got so overdone! look at any desktop background collection on any operating system these days. way overdone. wide aperture long focus with detailed backgrounds is moving back into fashion. and people are abandoning stock photo libraries and hollywood is not just losing money making woke movies they are losing it making movies that are 2 dimensional cartoons without any world around them.
Well, you're wrong. Women should always be talking because they're the smart ones. Also, if you ignorantly believe the world has been rewarding women for growing a human being for nine months then pushing it out at of a tiny hole and keeping it alive, you're wrong again. Women have been punished for having children and even disrespected because they have children, as if that is a sign of weakness. The world does not respect women for doing the very act that maintains humanity. Yet, it expects women to continue doing it while being told they're inferior. Maybe you should try enjoying the sounds women make so you can demand they birth your replicas.
Not sure if it is just that the loud minority is anti-natalist. I doubt it's widely agreed. Depends what anti-natalist means. For me anything including abortion. But I would also say it starts earlier with not wanting to have children.
Kat's avatar
Kat 4 days ago
That was part of it, sure. Maternity care was dreadful from start to finish and they go out of their way to let you know that you don't matter Didn't help that I was pregnant during Covid and had to spend the whole time justifying why I didn't want to be injected with an experimental substance while carrying my unborn child