Yes, I understand. This is still addressing the symptoms and not the root. Blocks are still allowed to grow >1MB per block and we are still arbitrarily discounting some bits over others through the Segwit discounting mechanism. Some arbitrary data can be included AND discounted. This is not what Satoshi gave us, he gave us a finite bitspace that was agnostic in the pricing of bits:sats regardless of where the bit are coming from. He gave us a 1MB limit and we broke that in a sly and around about way. BIP 110 will still need another BIP to address these root issues and the root severance from Satoshi’s original constants that define the economics of the system and value. The attack started in 2017, this should be pretty objective.

Replies (2)

Nothing is perfect in the Universe as you know, in reality. We can't have perpetuum mobile due to friction. But we still can have systems that operate with 99.99% efficiency.
Artel 21's avatar
Artel 21 1 week ago
Good take. I think we could start with BIP-110 since a lot of people like @Kyma Fi and @BitcoinIsFuture rooting for anti-spam and anti-csam. I’m pretty sure BIP-110 supporters (myself included) will support anti-discount movement. We should use next BIP-110 wisely to further strengthen Bitcoin.