GM, you cannot have sound money without sound memory. The double spend problem must be resolved at the fundamental level of base information. Gold is only sound money because the universe is sound memory. You live inside of a sound memory system; complexity requires it. Verifiable Genesis.

Alright boys, what do we say? One more bull market before the “bit flips” and divergence happens? Seems pretty obvious some large fraction of the Bitcoin network will undergo fork/capture by the quantum narrative. A time will come to either bend the knee to centralized quantum computer and fiat physics, or to the decentralized quantum computer (Bitcoin) and sound physics. Proof versus Theory. It can’t be both, the double spend must be resolved one way or the other. It all comes down to the soundness of the logic each individual mind is appended to. This seems pretty foreseeable and natural to the process of Bitcoin. It’s not good, nor bad. It just is.

What happens if the honeypots get hacked and coins get timelocked for over a century? Can you still get liquidated?

I was literally about to make a post this morning that we were overdue for another hack. Everything that can burn to AI, will burn. Remember, fiat debt is the toxic asset. 🫡

I can’t stress how good a 4-digit (or less) Bitcoin fiat price would be for the space. NGD is the decentralizing tech now. BIP NGD I’m becoming increasingly adamant we have to liq Saylor and blow up the ETFs, custodians and centralized miners. It would take the whole fiat economy down due to contagion. It’s all dead weight. Bad for plebs short term, great for plebs and decentralization long term. Good news, Bitcoin doesn’t care about my opinions. Fiat debt is the toxic asset, even if you “offset” with Bitcoin. Claims upon a provable substrate of conserved work using fiat debt (workless claim) is an illogical double spend Bitcoin will likely to have adjudicate sooner than later. The economics of energy are quite suggestive. If debt (workless claims) has authority to produce eternal bits of physical memory in the quantum computer; you have a double spend of energy/logic. Fiat cannot conserve work, yet it has increasing authority over permanently conserved bits it can force all nodes to bear for eternity in the timechain. Saylor once said that volatility is vitality…I tend to agree. Volatility is vital because a living system must remain free to move enough to purge what cannot survive its own physical and economic constraints.

The Post Quantum Cartel is heating up again to try to change the cryptography of Bitcoin. Fiat physics cannot resolve the measurement problem because they can’t compute a quantum (block) of time. Their “models” cannot logically resolve the double spend of information and energy from quantum to classical at Planck Scale. Don’t let them convince you a centralized quantum computer will break the decentralized quantum computer. There is no second best. Bitcoin broke their models and they haven’t a clue. How many blocks does it take?

@Simon Dixon I have made the structural claim that Bitcoin is the proper interpretation of what a quantum computer must logically be, I will not regurgitate the thesis here specifically. IF this thesis is true, what does the attack on self custody truly mean? I have argued that the sats are the RAM (random access memory) of the system that has a value based authority to create decentralized memory as distributed physical bits on nodes. Bitcoin cannot be money without distributed eternal memory; the memory MUST be eternal for Bitcoin to remain a working system. The memory must be non-contradictory (no double spend) for value to be conserved. Proof of work is physics made binary. Of course they don’t want you to have access to the write authority of memory in the quantum computer, of course they want to centralize the sats for maximum power projection and memory authority, of course they want to centralize the write authority via mining of the memory, of course they want plebs forking off; nodes leaving bitcoin IS centralization by mathematics. People are so stuck in talking about Bitcoin as money but refuse to see that eternal memory is an essential property for money to express value and meaning across/as time. Blocks of memory, blocks of time, blocks of energy, blocks of entropy, blocks of casual change. We need to do better; nobody understands Bitcoin and everyone has a fiat definition of “money”. WE are all wrong.

Simon Dixon Hard Talk • Big Bitcoin, the Financial Industrial Complex & the End of the Petrodollar | Simon Dixon on Bitcoin Archive w/ Archie (13 October 2026 - Interview #4) • Listen on Fountain

Two-hour interview titled "Big Bitcoin, the Financial Industrial Complex & the End of the Petrodollar", hosted by Archie on the Bitcoin Archive cha...

Bitcoin still needs to fix all of us before it can really begin to fix anything. The plebs love to append a fiat definition of money on to Bitcoin, which is the basis for all products and companies we build. “Solutions” built on a fiat definition will not serve Bitcoin long term. This is ok, it’s a part of the natural process. Proof of work needs to be defined physically so that we can understand why eternal memory is necessary for money to even exist. We have never had money as eternal memory before.

If it’s not apparent, The Flood has begun; it’s raining. The great DDOS is here. The signal is being inflated away by the rising sea of noise. Bitcoin and Christ remain the message, always. Good Luck🫡

GN