At @nosfabrica we are working on a tool that will be useful in exactly this scenario. Which, as we all know, is going to be a recurring problem!
Currently, the compromised account has a high WoT score using any of the currently-available WoT scoring algos. But GrapeRank has a remedy: NIP-56 reports. The GrapeRank score is currently visible to anyone who uses Brainstorm (still in alpha) on @Amethyst , @Nostria , and any client that uses NIP-85 Trusted Assertions. A sufficient number of NIP-56 reports from trusted accounts will drive his GrapeRank score from 100 to 0.
We are currently tweaking the default GrapeRank parameters that determine how many NIP-56 reports it will take to counteract the almost 2k trusted follows. If you would like to assist us in this process, then issue a NIP-56 report (report type can be other, something bespoke like “compromised”, or whatever you think is appropriate) of the compromised account, which is this one: @Frank Corva Old Account
#WoT FTW!
🍇 🧠 ⚡️
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Help us test out WoT scores and network alerts by reporting Frank's compromised nsec. You can use a category like "other" and type in "compromised" in the free text field if your client supports that
View quoted note →
"GrapeRank’lier NIP-56 reports could help mitigate compromised accounts, but adversarial actors will adapt—like the IDF’s Beirut strike showed how intel advantages erode fast. Just read an analysis on this dynamic:
https://theboard.world/articles/israeli-strike-beirut-intel-report"
(278 chars, URL excluded)