It is rational for Saylor to want to buy Bitcoin himself and sell stonks to you. The important question is whether it is rational for you to buy his stonks instead of cold hard sats.

Replies (9)

The market appears to be discounting all Bitcoin treasury companies to 1x mNAV or lower, which makes sense given Bitcoin owned by treasury companies is often encumbered by debt, dividends, and other obligations. Whereas Bitcoin in the wild is free, unencumbered, able to move anywhere on Earth in ten minutes without anyone’s permission. View quoted note →
omgitsgio's avatar
omgitsgio 12 hours ago
Sadly buying cold sats seems controversial these days. But the same thing happened with gold so it's an inevitable playbook image
This tells you what you need to know about saylor and treasury companies in general. They are attempting to take something pure bitcoin and rewrap it into another fiat scam.
Primal Protocol's avatar
Primal Protocol 10 hours ago
Rational choice is holding sats, not stonks, just like choosing red meat over grains.
I don’t see any controversy in earning bitcoin or exchanging dollars for it.