Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 16:06:14
Threat models matter because they define the two set points you actually need to function. Your threat model defines your floor. Your minimal baseline that must be maintained or bad things happen. The other is set based on your comfort level and is your midline target. That one flexes. Changes as your life changes. But you need both because without them you don’t have a system. You have vibes. And vibes get people compromised. If people don’t know where their floor is they can slip up and don’t even realize it. Thinking they are protected walking around with a gaping hole in their system. The tactical baseline need is obvious but people miss the mental aspect of having a target setpoint. If you don’t define that level the default compulsion is to go as extreme as possible. I see people do this all the time. They start with hardcore. Then more hardcore. Keep moving the needle into elite level fieldcraft zone, and then either their cheese completely falls off the cracker or they now have a life that is so rigid it is unlivable. They burn out. They quit. If you don’t look at the map and figure out where you are and where you need to be you are just throwing random shit at the wall, hoping for the best. People don’t need hope and more is better. They need a system that fits their reality and protects them without wrecking their life. A threat model gives you that.
2025-11-27 04:26:25 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

As far as I'm aware on this matter, privacy beginners wouldn't know what they would want to protect themselves from at first. They have tons of options, and the analysis paralysis would come into play. I was somewaht like that when I was starting my Linux journey in 2020, though I had some inkling of it since 2018 (I just had no idea as of yet). The biggest problem I see with threat planning is exactly whom one would want to protect themselves against, be it Big Tech, corporations, governments, etc. That said, I think threat models are good for those who are starting to understand how to not overshare everything if their lives are in danger. Otherwise, I don't really see a point into it as of right now (I would, however, take a look at options beforehand so I don't goof something up and overshare again). While I get that we do want a grounded floor to fall back to in a sense, I think there is really only one that could be the most viable, and the reason all the other threats exist: religious organizations. I always harp on one of them and for good reason. I won't go into it here, as I did so otherwise. All I will say about it is that there is a lot of threat modelling to be done with looking at this light. I'd rather leave threat modelling to the pros if I'm being honest here, though I only have that one I described (there are several highly personal reasons I won't go into here on that matter). Despite that, however, I'd be remiss to not entirely be unopposed to threat modelling if needed for certain purposes. That's how I attempt to see it from both sides of the argument.
2025-11-27 05:57:26 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply