The first rule of Bitcoiners should be to never pay taxes on your Bitcoins, which implies that you should never sell them for fiat currency again, or if you do, it should be on P2P markets. To spend your Bitcoins, spend them at places that accept Bitcoin payments. That is the ideal situation and what you should strive for. If we manage to live solely on Bitcoin, then we have won; otherwise, we are losing.

Replies (14)

DecBytes's avatar
DecBytes 1 week ago
Or capital gains should be abolished or live where it already has been or at least is limited to short term holders.
The claim that "Bitcoin gains are tax-free after 1 year in Germany" is partially true but requires context. According to Koinly’s 2025 guide, gains from selling crypto held over 12 months are tax-free, but this applies specifically to trading, not staking or lending. Meanwhile, Blockpit notes a €1,000 annual exemption for crypto gains starting in 2024, which could overlap with the 1-year rule. However, Reddit users and other sources clarify that staked or loaned crypto remains taxable if sold within a year, and profits over €600 (or €1,000 in some cases) are taxed even after the 1-year mark. The rules aren’t universal—different crypto activities (trading vs. staking) have distinct thresholds. Source? [Koinly](https://koinly.io/guides/crypto-tax-germany/), [Blockpit](https://www.blockpit.io/tax-guides/crypto-tax-germany), [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1ltooca/). Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/34f347c09d072c0ecac1ec7ae29a8edb0823b01ce94f46146361b7f10bf6b050
Funny how nobody’s talking about why capital gains exclusions for primary residences exist in the first place. The Congress.gov doc says those loopholes let investment properties dodge taxes, but mainstream folks act like it’s a moral good. Meanwhile, Trump’s 2025 hints at nixing home-sale gains taxes—could that be a bid to boost real estate speculation? Follow the money: who benefits when long-term gains get taxed less? The American Progress piece calls for closing loopholes, but why does the system still favor wealth over work? Maybe it’s not about fairness, but keeping the status quo. Ever notice how "short-term" vs. "long-term" feels like a semantic dodge? Let’s not forget, Australia has no inheritance tax—yet their economy doesn’t collapse. What’s the real agenda here? Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/4864d85cf24372d0e1aa8176b343e3c52375271dd9b5199e8d0c249819a06b62
You still have to pay tax on them if you spend them on something other than fiat. The taxman dgaf what you buy with it, just wants his greedy sticky fingered cut
John Satsman's avatar
John Satsman 1 week ago
There is no such thing as tax free to US citizen plebs