Matt Odell Maligning BIP-110
Login to reply
Replies (69)
Run Bitcoin Knots and BIP-110.
View quoted note →
These are my favorite Mad Kratter vlogs, watching you slowly but surely ostracise yourself from everyone but a few hundred Knotzis. Keep going, you're doing great 👍🏼
Bitcoin is Freedom Money and you and Citrea will fail making it Ethereum 2.0, SLopp.
🤯
😂😂😂😂😂
Most impotent response ever on a censorship resistant network.
How is the island Jameson? Did you went with your kids and umcle Adam?
How big are quantum sigs?
@ODELL IS COOKED...!!!
I hope @ODELL stops hanging out with terrorists of the bitcoin like RobHam and correct course before successful activation of BIP110 (assuming he wants to save his reputation)
Plebs have woken up to the elite culture which has been going on for a quite sometime in bitcoin and plebs won't tolerate this shit anymore.
View quoted note →
How big is the quantum threat?
This is so fuckin sad, another hero is biting the dust. @Matthew Kratter @Luke Dashjr @Bitcoin Mechanic are doing it out of their ego? You have to be out of touch to claim that @ODELL .Is it something that your Epstein’s Bitcoin banker buddy @jack mallers with uncle Howard told you to say?
Im too dumb to take a side here so ill do nothing
Bitcoin doesn’t care about their feelings.
View quoted note →
Odell didnt have problem welcoming "Andy" Back on Citadel dispatch and now he is accusing you for working for Thiel lol.
I unfollowed and muted him when I saw that. He’s been saying more and more sketchy shot over the last year.
Wtf is going on??
Influencers influencing influencers
You really worked for Thiel? That would seem to be a no-exit scenario. He's a super villain.
Maybe they genuinely believe the spam issue is not a crisis. Ever consider that Matthew? Sub 1 sat/vB… when has an arbitrary price floor ever been beneficial in voluntary economic activity? Why would CSAM be hardcoded?? You’re overly concerned about plebs’ interactions with sequences of bits on the blockchain but completely ignore the rails for those bits that on occasion facilitate the most heinous behavior. Why would authorities or people we want to become bitcoiners ever make that distinction?
I've slain so many heroes these past few months that my heart has no more room left for all those graveyards. :(
Hahahah, very dumb of you!
110 is an attack on Bitcoin
in what way? isn't bitcoin under a dozen attacks all at once?
Man…. It’s amazing (and sad) how much the Bitcoin ecosystem is changing.
When I discovered bitcoin, it felt wild, free, and pure. The OG crowd was amazing, knowledgeable and loving.
Like everything in this world, it gets corrupted by self interest and government overreach. The worst part is that we invited them in.
I’m a simple man who just wants a store of value that cannot be compromised. All of this other bullshit is hard to keep up with and disappointing.
I guess time will tell.
View quoted note →
Great argument, idiot
Nostr Rambo Lopptard speaks.
It is kilobytes.
It is the only real threat currently.
I'm not in favour of BIP110, and I'm also not in favour of Peter Thiel type companies using Bitcoin as a decentralised immutable memory module.
I started working to further Bitcoin because uncensorable money seemed like a good idea when the government made me show a vaccine QR code in order to buy food. However I did not sign-up to Bitcoin being used by Palantir in order to carry out genocide (i.e. Palestine, Ukraine) and build totalitarian control grids, that are known by many techno-theologians as 'The Beast System'.
Why don't you put your Citrea use case on the Liquid network? At least there it'll have guardrails insofar as the functionaries will have an opportunity to do an emergency pause?
Good way to reframe the question
Yes and that’s fine, it can handle it
The bitcoin influencers are fighting again
You encapsulated what has been bothering me over the last year. Odell was one of my faves and must be the reason I am even sending this note on nostr right now. But him having no strong public opinion on the unfolding mess over the past few years doesn't make sense when he is so hardcore on other things, like ditching Twitter entirely for Nostr. He didn't need to support Knots or BIP-110, but avoiding the topic felt like it was meant to avoid criticizing his friends. I understand and respect that, if that is indeed what is happening, but it's damaged his credibility on bitcoin and freedom tech, at least for me.
Hey Knotzi, any chance you're willing to put your money where your mouth is?
Back in September I publicly offered to enter into a wager with anyone who was claiming that Bitcoin Core v30 was going to result in a massive node crash / network outage. Nary a Knotzi took me up on it, to my great chagrin.
Today I'm making a similar, but better, offer to BIP-110 supporters. I propose we enter into a trustless fork futures contract. I'll take the side that will make the deposited BTC only spendable if BIP-110 fails, you take the side that's only spendable upon success.
Minimum 1 BTC wager to make it worth my time. Come take my coins and show us your conviction! Who will have the guts to put their money where their mouth is?
@Bitcoin Mechanic @Luke Dashjr @Matthew Kratter @npub1jt97...la9y @npub1cjw4...j2rh @npub1gth6...3a7q
View quoted note →
It's such a huge emergency that they moved back the fork deadline from February to September 🤡
🤣
Almost all influencers like Odell and Lopp end up acting as if they had been filmed abusing a child on a private island. That's why I take all influencers lightly. Keep up the good work.
Fwiw I'm an OG, i guess. BIP110 is the Blocksize war all over again. Reckon same outcome. If the zealots do create a hard fork, and all the unnecessary drama, remember to sell it for BTC.
Ok let's say Odell is right and its an attack on bitcoin. You get a minority of node runners running a soft fork and reorg the chain by legally threatening miners by spamming the non fork chain with csam.
If that's an valid attack surface how do you prevent governments from doing it a hell of a lot more effectively?
@ODELL @Matthew Kratter @Marty Bent
He is not investor in Twitter so he can go hardcore on Nostr.
Anyways, same thoughts here brother, same thought. It’s so sad, but I guess we are growing up…
The Problem
Bitcoin core with overwhelming network use (98%) increases the default op return limit from 83 to 100k. Why? The number one reason as stated by Jameson Lopp on “The ‘What is Money?’ Show”, Citrea’s protocol needed large blobs of data widely distributed and relayed in the P2P network. Only in rare cases would that data actually need to be mined and added to a block. I believe every other reason given was a “fake because” to justify reason number one.
Best solution so far is Bip 110. For those that don’t like it they need to put forth a better solution. Saying it’s not a problem, or it sucks but there is nothing you can do makes me question everything about you.
To be fair I could be wrong about everything.
v30 failed on social
knots bip110 immune reaction
consensus: core eating humble pie
🪢🛡️⚒️🌊🤷♂️
YOU DIDNT ANSWER THE QUESTION, NONE OF YOU DO
INTELLECTUALLY, SPIRITUALLY AND FACIALLY BANKRUPT 🤡🌎
mm, that tracks
It's so funny
Sorry, not making deals with shitcoiners.
That's a pretty good question. I think creating division in the Bitcoin culture and convincing a bunch of plebs they are on a holy war makes the attack more likely to succeed... Not unlike some weird social engineering attack. Now Unless things drastically change it will fail miserably, but the more "support" they can gin up, the more disruptive the attack, which appears to be the purpose of all this.
Ironically, this will probably make Bitcoin more resistant to this type of attack in the future. The haters are blowing their wad too soon. Anyways, thanks for the cheap sats and gfy. 
Bitcoin runs on FOSS. There are too many businesses trying to profit from bitcoin without actually acquiring any. VC are turning their investment capital into spam dust hoping for radical asymmetry modeled from OpenSea. The VC transactions are financing miners who will be exiting stage left with each halving.
Odell blasts Strategy for accummulating BTC, but not business actors making actual protocol changes and hacks that put bitcoin at risk. The Core vs Knots "debate" is corporate VC stonewalling to the max. All this AI generated filth (Runes and other stupid shit) is not good for nodes. The backed up sewer mempool and a UTXO bloat on its way to 90% spam does not seem to be an issue worthy of discussion to these people.
There is only one simple solution, which is to follow Szabo and Rug the Spammers.
But like how? Right now its not a state sponsored attack (probably) if this is a real weakness and all you need to do is control some relatively small amount of the hash to cause a major reorg how are you supposed to defend against it
Fundamentally its just what people consider to be the right chain right?
It won't work but it if there were not the social engineering/ divide the movement aspect then the whole thing it would be much easier to defend against. And if you are the attacker and you can trick some miners(I'm sure some plebs running bit axe might run this) or the hostage tactics actually work on a non negligible amount of the miners then even better.
Not state sponsored attack(probably)? I''m nott sure about that one
"But then again, if Kratter is so well connected and obviously smart and functional, why can't he see bip110 for the failure it is?"
Things that make you go hmmmmm
View quoted note →
few 🪢🛡️⚒️🌊
🤣
I haven't tracked which nostr projects were opensats grants and which are vc funded. But I'll still respect sacrificing the outreach of Twitter to go all in on nostr. But yeah, we're in a new era now.
If you truly detest me as a shitcoiner then the logical decision would be to take my money by winning a trustless fork futures contract with me.
Imagine how much shitcoinery you will save Bitcoin from by putting that BTC into pure hands! You'll be a hero!
what is the matrix?
if its not gonna work wtf is odell and anyone else crying about?
We don't realistically believe bitcoins going to get banned. We argue the probabilities and game theory.
Is the game theory of this really the same? It looks like a small intolerant minority(bip 110) can simply soft fork and wait. Maybe they attack the chain with jpegs actively or they just wait for inevitable spam. (I don't think anyone is arguing spam isn't real)
If no one values the new ruleset nothing happens
If it has value every block produced under bip110 its valid for all players.
How much of the hash power makes this minority enough of a risk miners can't ignore it?
Is 1% enough? 10?
Avoid criticizing his friends is one thing. Making claims that Luke and Mechanics do what they do for ulterior motives is really low.
You, just like any of these spam supporting influencers, resort to personal attacks because ethically, technically and logically there is nothing wrong with 110.
You’re an embarrassment for Mises, please choose a different handle.
False, I specifically explained that Citrea neither needed nor asked for the change. Naughty clanker!
mr slopp
you said on breadlove's question "what's opreturn uncap solved?"
"it's only citrea use case by now"
"it's an extremely edge case"
"who knows what more use cases"
Pepe López
ms slopp
Luke is calling everyone a pedo.
Exactly my point. Call him out on that then. That has nothing to do with 110.
And what about lightning network features that depends on OP_RETURN?
Continue to work. 99% of all nodes filtered OP_RETURN larger than 83 Bytes and Lightning network was working fine. Meaning majority of OP_RETURN was smaller than 83 Bytes. That was the case for 15 years.
BIP 110 allows OP_RETURNs smaller than 83 Bytes. No problem for LightningNetwork.
Even features like atomic swaps?
Swaps, coinjoins etc. all works fine. Bitcoin worked like that _always_.
OP_RETURN was capped at 83 Bytes and all worked fine.
The compromised Core changed it because of Citrea and because of shitcoiners and they apparently lie that Lightning or other things won't work.
This is OP_RETURN true history
The OP_RETURN Limit Removal: Gaslighting or Technical Necessity?
“Don’t change Bitcoin here’s my change for Bitcoin” Odell is correct, he’s also correct about how you’ll lose.