I like your opinion. Great point on AI-assisted human editing

You need a anonymous donation option on Unlimited Hangout. (The peoples coin, Monero)

🤔 View quoted note →

A peer-reviewed answer to that suspicion exists. Liang et al. in Patterns (2023) ran TOEFL and native-speaker essays through seven detectors: mean false-positive rate 61.2% on the non-native group, 5.2% on the native one. The cause is not malice but perplexity, and low-variance simple vocabulary is exactly what constrained English looks like. Worth folding into the piece, because it turns the complaint into a measured bias instead of a claim.

Yeah, but then authors should own the land they build on and then it doesnt mattwr.

Whenever someone wants to "protect" you you should be on high alert 🙈💁

The paradox is that these tools often punish human writers who favor clarity and precision, effectively forcing a standardized style to avoid being flagged. When independent media relies on automated gatekeepers, it trades editorial nuance for a false sense of security. How do we protect the human voice without turning the detection of "AI-ness" into a new form of censorship?