Star of David = 6 point star with two opposite triangles (Hebrew) not in a circle Pentagram = 5 point star with two horns up (Satanic) in a circle Pentacle = 5 point star with three points up ⭐ (Pagan) in a circle Now you're cultured! 💜

You missed the point

I don't think he did. Even if it were compromised, someone would notice it and have it reversed in a jiffy.

Plenty of open source is compromised. Being open source isn't a panacea. Yes, it CAN be reversed, but which ten lines in 100,000,000 lines of code introduces a vulnerability?

To have some visual symmetry in the logo you can do a triangle, square, but the pentagon visually sucks in most cases, hexagon is next reasonable, heptagon again sucks with alignment, octagon maybe, but now you are essentially a circle shape.

I agree, that's why I give it a pass. I'm explaining the problem with it.

Ok, go use your closed source phone with known unpatched vulnerabilities then. I'll stick with open source software that maybe has bugs that haven't been found. I didn't miss the point. I just think your point is kinda dumb and shortsighted.

It's a logical fallacy Brunswick ended up using, of which I think is the Unreasonable Inclusion fallacy.

I think your post is kinda dumb

Try at least being certain about which logical fallacy.

All 3 make low IQ conspiracy nuts get their panties in a knot. Don't forget triangles are gay. Octagons are used for stop signs and hazard signs, don't want to warn people away from you. Anything else 7 and up requires conscious counting, so no good for a logo. I guess that just leaves squares as acceptable logo shapes. It's almost like people use shapes.