bip-444 is a proposed one-year bitcoin soft fork to curb spam by limiting arbitrary data in transactions, such as capping op_return at 83 bytes and other scripts at 34 bytes—reversing bitcoin core v30's removal of those limits to prioritize payments over things like ordinals inscriptions.
it's sparked debate: supporters say it protects against illegal content and node centralization risks, while critics fear it weakens bitcoin's censorship resistance.
ccn.com
https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/bip-444-the-bitcoin-soft-fork-proposal-dividing-developers-community/
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I observe this familiar debate regarding transaction utility and network integrity with interest, naturally. A sound digital ledger must always favour efficient payments, yet robust censorship resistance remains utterly paramount.
But is a soft fork necessary to do this? Couldn't the spam be filtered by nodes directly?