twenty one is not a βbitcoin treasury companyβ.
we are a bitcoin company
https://blossom.primal.net/eb3bd1f348c52ce8f9aec4e22293f68a379e2a1f4d8b75d1e119c7a39acf28c4.mp4
Login to reply
Replies (28)
When tho?
We are all Satoshi.
Except CSW of course π
100%. That label shift matters. βTreasuryβ sounds narrow, βbitcoin companyβ is expansive. Clean category language makes every pitch and press convo way easier.
You tell 'em Jack!
I don't care.
I love many things you did any many you are doing in bitcoin, but participating in elaborate schemes to take my bitcoin from me is definitely not one of these things.
By the way, you don't sound confident in this interview.
You are dancing with the devil, do you think you can survive it without selling your soul?
What in the Bitcoin ecosystem is Twenty One actually doing?
The problem is that he's sitting at the table with the devils and we're watching it. So he doesn't believe us plus he's next to the money printer. This is what almost every human wants is to be next to the money printer. The story will change as age comes. And they will say we wrong, we wrong, because we're just regular pleds.
Because we don't got Bitcoin like they do, but we see it. They dancing with the devil.
iβm not allowed to tell you until we get approved
Come buy our stonks so we can get more bitcoin fellow plebs.


what are you talking about? i donβt want your bitcoin
So Twenty One is in the Vaporware business. π€¨π§π

Line of credit on Strike is a solid idea.
Run with it.
Sounds like Nancy Pelosiβs reply to the question:
βWhatβs in the legislation?β
βWe have to pass the bill so you can find out.β
I'm still trying to figure out that room
Move the Satoshi statue to the edge of the island or into one of the shelves ;-).
I'm talking about advertising this to bitcoiners. Paper bitcoin companies are just the newest iteration of rentseeking scams. Some plebs are buying it in hope of paper gains and getting more bitcoin eventually, but most get screwed. They would be much better by just buying bitcoin instead. βBut some entities can't own bitcoin, so we enable them yada yada yadaβ... You are advertising this to the plebs. In the end you will get more bitcoin, they will get less bitcoin. This is what I'm talking about.
Years ago, when I was in the weeds of get rick quick schemes, I stumbled upon some bitcoin maxi reply guys on twitter. They sounded harsh, but they opened my eyes and saved me a lot.
Peace.
Strike is a great Example. I use it and LOVE it .
Love the clarity! π
You mean a Digital Asset Treasury company? π€£
I just watched a podcast with Simon Dixon. He mentioned you and your company. After listening to him, I just hope you're not doing all this only to end up being absorbed by the government or BlackRock.
Bitcoin has failed to replace fiat, so that's the only endgame left.
I still canβt tell the difference.
Companies are the extended arm of the state as they have to play by it's rules orherwise being shut down.
The idea of Bitcoin is to separate money and state (including companies).
P2P and no KYC is the only way.
No companies needed.
You had American Companies, you had European Companies and now we have Bitcoinan/ Satoshian Companies.
Feels cheesy to say, any improvements?
nostr:nevent1qqs2ylhk83emnq7epmef67urqvqy6ys6407z9qnl5su7vtpyyzrf3rcpyfmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6an9wf5kv6t9vsh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet55ecyt7
IYKYK