Magnus's avatar
Magnus 4 days ago
One reason to fork is that, when core-bitcoin break by CSAM arbitrary data or whatever, people will realize that they already have dormant blake-coins. That will help adoption.

Replies (2)

Where is this CSAM stored? is it stored in nonsegwit (Layer 0 Bitcoin) or is it stored in witness (Layer 1 Segwit)? If it’s stored in Layer 0 Blockspace (nonwitness) then Blake-fork still would inherit the same data unless the fork is also temporal in height to a block state where this information is not yet written. If it exists in segwit, you simply don’t need to store segwit bits. You can just fork Segwit without breaking Layer 0 Bitcoin consensus and you can solve the issue without hardforking the chain via POW change.
Magnus's avatar
Magnus 3 days ago
The OP_RETURN (max ~100kB). Not that anyone would use it for efficient storage, but it would be a liability to nodes.