Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 22:29:26
Pivot pivot pivot. I'm not going to play the price is right with qbits. Somewhere in that gap between 24 qbits held for a few microseconds and ~2000 held for hours to do shor on one Bitcoin key, the ceiling is lurking. But how do we know the ceiling is low? I think that is where you are going. Because we have reproduced in these labs - with cold and quiet and indirection through codes, etc. - the coldest quietest corners of the universe. But you can't get quieter than silence. You can't get colder than absolute zero. And that's where we find the ceiling. Because the physics doesn't change. All we can do is remove noise. But you can't isolate the system from itself. We are assymptoticslly approaching total isolation. Which means we are asymptotically approaching the ceiling. And it is no where near 2k qbits for hours. You can't show me evidence of anything that approaches that scale because it doesn't exist. We will get a really precise picture of where the ceiling is, and that is a cool scientific result. But we will not get a QC that can run shor on a Bitcoin key. We have enough data to say with confidence that that is physically impossible. More every day. I am not surprised by all the prize winners and bag holders and dreamers who don't want to admit this openly. People are weak to temptation. But this is not Bitcoin's concern. Tick tock, next block.
2025-12-04 20:13:59 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

>Somewhere in that gap between 24 qbits held for a few microseconds and ~2000 held for hours to do shor on one Bitcoin key, the ceiling is lurking. Ok so now we're getting somewhere. Right then, Atom held around 28 logical qubits and ran Berns-Vaz algo w demonstrable error correction, under a second. That was 2 years ago, a lot has happened since. And shor's we need ~2000 and hours. I'd argue that for shor's it's more likley around 1,700, we've already optimised it down by half, and there's more optimisation in the tank. pure math by the way. so by offloading the most complicated steps (modular arithmetic and fraction conversion) to highly efficient classical methods, the quantum part gets streamlined. You're saying somewhere between 28 and 1 second and (if optimisation holds)1,700 and hours is some arbitrary limit of the universe. Atom will ship commercial machines 48 next year. Means them + Microsoft, machiens at 48 logical, capable of running deep, sustained computations for minutes, hours, or potentially days in 2026. (this is all proven out in their lab, to prove me right that's just waiting 6 months to ship. (it is right though) So 48, and running for hours. Where does it stop? At 96 and days? If not at 96 and days then at 192 and weeks? If you can't say where the limit is, or even give a range, based on some physical properties, then you are basing the limit on nothing. You have to give a number to show you've got some physical basis for your impossible statement.
2025-12-04 20:45:01 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply