🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit's avatar
🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit 7 months ago
1. I clarified the main question already: what are you asking the devs to encrypt here that they haven't already? In other words, what's the problem? 2. Everyone knows modern computer networks are "crackable," encrypted or otherwise, but you threw the word "crackable" in there. I was noting how weird that was and how you put it next to the word "unencrypted" like there was supposed to be some connection
↑ Parent

Replies (2)

Default avatar
npub1yxp7...399s 7 months ago
> what are you asking the devs to encrypt here that they haven't already? In other words, what's the problem? I recommend the devs (1) implement payment channels so the sender can create his payment data on a second layer instead of the base layer (2) implement onion routing between payment channels so that even the sender's channel counterparties aren't in a position to know if he's the sender or not (3) within those channels, actually encrypt all communication between counterparties so that ISPs can't read it (4) do not publish payment data on a blockchain, not even the encrypted blobs transmitted between channels Or, you can just use lightning, because it already has all of those features
1 replies ↓
↑