The government is the primary beneficiary of conspiracy theories because it allows it to carry out its actions openly.
When someone comes out saying:
- Man has not been to the moon
- The Earth is flat
- Explosives were planted in the Twin Towers
- There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq
- Covid was a hoax
Lies, half-truths, truths all get mixed together and everything ends up discredited. This is what interests the government, when the reality is:
- Man did go to the moon
- The Earth is not flat
- No explosives were planted in the Twin Towers, but the U.S. facilitated the entire attack
- There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and the reason the U.S. started the war was that Saddam wanted to invalidate the petrodollar by accepting payment for oil in euros
- Covid is a hoax
False conspiracy theories are like shit that dirties everything—you can have good fruit, but if you smear it with shit, it’s no longer good.
Login to reply
Replies (18)
People will talk a big game until this experiment comes out. Then it's on to whataboutism.


Celestial_Theodolite_Index - Obsidian Publish
The Celestial Theodolite A method of measuring the precise timing of celestial occlusions, which are moments when a celestial object intersects wit...
You sound absolutely fucking retarded
Your mother really was retarded to have you.
Put the data in an LLM if you need it explained to you.
I don’t argue with retards.
I do recommend reading this reexamination: https://bit.ly/2DwjFDl
As there is scientific evidence for thermitic material in the 9/11 dust. What AE911 wants is an official re-investigation with subpoenas and witness testimonies. So those responsible can be held accountable.
It's such a religion. You can't even look at one study because it stands to turn your belief system upside down.
Thermite has been thoroughly debunked
I see, because the WTC did not use the same colorful explosive fuses:
It doesn’t exclude a military grade nano-thermite explosive with a different ignition mechanism. So we can’t say this was not a controlled demolition from this “debunk”.
As with most of these things, they go in with presuppositions before building their case. I considered it plausible, even likely, up until just last year.


Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
With basic, easy to verify research - Case closed.
Just curious what you think is causing that if not "explosives" of some sort or another?


🤷
Not really, they clearly focus on the official narrative being falsified and if the nano-thermite hypothesis is false that does not imply that a single girder pushed aside can cause free-fall of WTC7. You do agree the official narrative does not hold either right?
Of course the official narrative is false. I err towards the conclusions drawn by Judy Woods and such, which that revisionist account covers quite well.
We will likely never know the exact events, but it is possible to build a relatively coherent picture if one can overcome certain beliefs or dissonances, like other forms of weaponry.
For example, the distinct lack of specific seismic activity (p and s waves) suggests that it wasn't simply 'pulled' in the same way traditional demolitions are. So we have to seek alternative explanations.
Come on you two. Same vibe:


2 words.
Building seven
No. This fuck comes onto a truth telling platform and then calls us retarded for understanding the lies.
Fucking glowie.
Yeah see I didn’t get that from your initial reply. :P