"Bitcoin is feature complete."
You keep repeating this mantra. When did this happen? Before or after we did a soft-fork to enable lightning? It seems you are unaware of this?
Because there are things like vaults which do require additional features. Similarly multi-party lightning.
Your absolutist position seems quite hard to justify, though I'm trying to give you an much credit as I can, lest this become Twitter.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Bitcoin should have been feature complete before segwit in my opinion. I don't care about vaults, I don't care about multi-party lightning. I care about hard money that can't be debased or stolen, that's it.
My "absolutist" position is simply that bitcoin is working perfectly fine and all your new opcodes are an attack on the network and completely unnecessary for bitcoin's success.
If it aint broken, don't fix it.
Right, so no lightning at all for you then?
At least that's consistent. No zaps for you then!
If his Bitcoin is feature complete, then I guess he’ll be done using it by the year 2106.