Anyone got a timestamp on this? πππ
nostr:nevent1qqs0lj6xcw50r3wuzd67ff4jnzjsvkk07v7fs3agss6upr6u2jxyu0spzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczyr5dvlzrtf99jvzwzs2zsr549mlp00jz2n72y7gkha3lnae72j46gqcyqqqqqqgnjx58g
Login to reply
Replies (5)
Incredible.
I shared the link with timestamp. But itβs 19:27.
I gave it a listen. The context was that you don't do a consensus level change to play whack a mole with individual styles of spam. A softfork pertaining to reducing or removing op_return is not that, so the irony you seem to be pointing out is superficial. And I think you know that.
But this is just whack a mole since it doesnβt stop embedding data and it certainly canβt stop illegal material. All it actual does is attempt to prove that you can use fear to control bitcoiners Ike so many sheep.
Lol, I meant, a cryptographic timestamp. To prove certain things... :D