Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 19:50:05
That's one of the "selling points" made by the big corporations when encountering people thinking of self-hosting. Not everyone wants to deal with the hassle of self-hosting, but I strongly believe this "hassle-free" approach is causing people never to question who truly owns their data. The beauty of self-hosting is that you decide the level of security and redundancy. Depending on your comfort level, budget, and the risk factors in your geographical location, you can select the setup that makes the most sense for you. In my case, I live in Florida, so the likelihood of a hurricane is high (potential for water and wind damage). However, Florida is large and my parents live in a different town about 3 hours away, so I can have a NAS at my parents and my server at my place. You can have local backups like in a RAID set up for your drives (in case the physical drive goes bad) and then have a redundant NAS located at someone else's house in your family (parents/kids/best friend). If I wanted to be extremely secure, I could set up a NAS at my brother's house in Seattle across the country. Ultimately, what you start realizing when you self-host is just how much of what you think is digitally "yours" actually isn't.
2025-03-12 13:43:07 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

Great point. I definitely understand the aspect of “my data” not being owned by me using the cloud services. I have to learn more about networking to understand but the NAS is basically a replica of the data copied to another set of drives? I could totally see this being ample protection if you can run a few copies like this in various locations. I’m going to dig further into this for sure.
2025-03-12 14:30:22 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply