That's odd, the rational node runner should desire massive OP_RETURNs because it would cut the effective maximum block size by 75% and make running a node less resource intensive.
Login to reply
Replies (11)
and confirm 1 tx per block
e por que não usam doge pra essa sujeira ? E congelem o código do #btcoin ? !!!
Let's be honest, practically nobody transacts on chain.
If they did, fees for block space wouldn't be at historic lows.
and that's what this is all about: artificially filling blocks to enrich miners.
was that motte and bailey or shifting the goal posts?
How does filling up my disk space with child porn benefit me?
A 26 TB disk costs $550 USD. Disk space is the least of the concerns. Do more research into the topic. It has more to do with game theory, incentives amd the ability to control the data on your node.
Imo both sides have valid perspectives but somehow this has devolved into flame wars rather than what should be a respectful dialog. Novices jumping down the throats of long time devs with low resolution takes and accusations is most definitely not helping.
It's hard to manage changes, updates, security patches etc. on a 24/7 decentralized monetary network. Litecoin was used during the block size wars to help test LN and it's required changes. Your point is not wrong, but it's no trivial task.
My advice is to try to stay calm and not assume long time contributors to bitcoin are bad actors. Don't trust, verify - yes, but that doesn't mean to assume any change is a conspiracy.
We can run any node software we want and shouldn't be assumed to be bad actors. Choice is good and multiple implementations is positive. I think we just need to stop short of confidently assigning negative motivations to people who have been doing amazing work for years.
Open and respectful discussion between people who understand all these dynamics is what's needed. Not emotional libelous flame wars.
troll alert! massive OP_RETURNs saving nodes? 🤣
Nah, they just bloat blocks and hike fees 🤷🏻♂️
enough with this lame ass argument, its fucking retarded.
Ruim mesmo será quando tentarmos fazer uma transação on-chain, e pagarmos mais de 30% de taxa devido a tanta sujeira futura executando nos blocos, isso deve ser desestimulado, recorde-se do exemplo ultimo halvin, onde aqueles que queria usar o #bitcoin como dinheiro naquele período não conseguiram devido a taxas elevadas, mesmo que por algum momento perdeu a sua essência, quando mais permitimos mudanças fora da essência do #bitcoin pior ele ficará, ou voltaremos logo ao bitcoin cash ?