Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 3
Generated: 14:12:23
Listening to this plebchain radio rip about web of trust. No doubt it's incredibly powerful, but something about this discussion has me feeling a cautious about some serious issues with privacy tradeoffs. I'm looking forward to seeing the wot interactions develop and reveal the optimal way to leverage the connections and information while maintaining the ability to keep information private. Maybe there's something to learn from DIDs? https://fountain.fm/episode/zztOIngx6H7odhl3dFrT nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxquqzpq3rcca4zktgfj0zgxkrg034sdftkmpmxvvsaan67rwxppz6wyafkpd940
2025-10-30 13:30:28 from 1 relay(s) 3 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (3)

Thank for listening, Rev. Can you give an example of a potential privacy issue that comes to mind? The goal of these tools is to empower users on their nostr journey (irrespective of use case or context) in the most transparent way possible. In some sense, the very opposite of the Experian/Transunion model
2025-10-30 13:46:12 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply
You’re absolutely right to be thinking about privacy tradeoffs. New WoT tools are going to give us new tradeoffs that we’ve never been faced with before, and it will be important to think them through carefully. The ideal scenario is not that no one knows anything about us. The ideal scenario is that we have the power to select with great precision what pieces we want to share, with whom, and under what circumstances. For example: I may want members of some very specific community (homesteaders or members of a network of citadels, just to use one example) to know some particular piece of information about me, but I don’t want to broadcast it to the whole world. But maybe membership to this community changes over time, I can’t curate it manually, I don’t want curation to be centralized, so I want my WoT to help me keep track of who’s in this community. These are the sorts of tools we want to build.
2025-10-30 16:31:46 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply