its not censorship, and its not 5 randoms. Those 5 people mute option only affects people that follows all 5 of them simultaneously. If I mute you in my feed it’s not censorship just because “the decision of a single person dictated the blocking of a message”. Muting an user is an expression of one’s opinion, and if you want to dictate who is not allowed to mute someone in their social mesh you are the one enforcing censorship in the network.
Replies (3)
Muting someone is optional and always on the user side. The devs cannot globally mute anyone at their will. Those automated mutes are personalised for specific users based on who was muted by their close contacts. It’s literally the opposite of a “people you could know” recommendation, not censorship. You got it very well explained and this thread is obviously bait.
It is definitely censorship, sorry. There's no valid reason my posts should be hidden when I don't spam or anything and I make some of the highest quality posts on nostr
You cant be serious that you are now coming to me with this. Close circles and you get easily 5 accounts that have a problem with the same account when you have 1 person running minimum of 5 accounts here. How can then this 5 accounts of a single handler be responsible for shadowing my account to all his 5 accounts followings as protection. This whole place is rigged. Dont test my intelligence cuz all of this can be manipulated by 1 single person. Cant you see that? 😒🫨✨️🔥
