its not censorship, and its not 5 randoms. Those 5 people mute option only affects people that follows all 5 of them simultaneously. If I mute you in my feed it’s not censorship just because “the decision of a single person dictated the blocking of a message”. Muting an user is an expression of one’s opinion, and if you want to dictate who is not allowed to mute someone in their social mesh you are the one enforcing censorship in the network.

Is this the real account or just one of fuckstrs cloned alt accounts?

The hell are you talking about ? Real people of nostr who follow me know how real I am. If you have doubt take your sweet time and find out on my feed. Im doxxed ... live and representing my own self.

She has a point. WoT censorship can be gamed in nasty ways if we're not careful. Also echochamber effects. Handle with care. If a clique can do a heathers on anyone they don't like, parts of Nostr will turn into high schools. Unpopular opinions will die fast. Communities will schism quickly on controversial issues. And it advantages people who don't offend anyone and could have a chilling effect on what people are willing to say. Not to be old fashioned, but my grandmother told me to judge people for myself and not to put much stock in what other people say about them. It was good advice and has kept me out of drama and made me some of my most authentic friends. I don't just want to hear from people that most people I know agree with. Perhaps focusing WoT on positive signals is a safer path? There are other ways to impose costs on spammers.