Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 10 months ago
I don't remember saying that they should care. Mostly I've been hoping that people care so that I could get some kind of answer to my questions. Though in their shoes I'd probably see it as a great opportunity to talk about my beliefs, and if they challenge me at all, to give a practical demonstration of how robust and useful my beliefs are. Really the only reason I wouldn't want to engage is if I was insecure and afraid that I secretly had pussy loser beliefs. Thanks for responding by the way. I admire your self confidence.

Replies (2)

Primate's avatar
Primate 10 months ago
Ok, because I appreciate your cordial response, I will continue to help define your questions. A statist is someone who could not imagine a human social order without someone else administering it. Someone who worries about how others spend their sats is patronizing in a sort of metaphysical way, since a decentralized ledger is the first objective record in human history.
Scoundrel's avatar
Scoundrel 10 months ago
Hmm, I appreciate your definition. I have trouble imagining someone whose heart stops unexpectedly recovering their biological human order without someone else administering their CPR. Does that mean I am a statist of biological human order for worlds with unanticipated heart attacks? Are you one of those fools who thinks there's circumstances where it isn't assault to crush in someone's sternum without any kind of communicated consent?