Hmmm, sounds like the Bitcoin Citadel model.

And you lost me at global governance. Thanks for the good coverage as always WWebb 👍

Thanks for this hint. Does it mean p. Thiel's investment in Prospera in Honduras 🇭🇳 paid off? Or what is the status there? Any connections?

sounds awesome

Lookie, a new cabal! Wake up, people. Thank you lain Davis, Whitney Webb and the other investigative journalists who do brave work. ❤️‍🔥 View quoted note →

Said it before and I'll say it again: Cult. 🤢🤮

Very interesting stuff Whitney.

👀 @teepolitics

It's still too short to 'pay off', but I doubt Thiel did it for exit. Legal status is uncertain, everyone is waiting for election's results, but we're rather optimistic regardless. Check @Bitcoin District Prospera

The city-state model is a vessel. The question is who holds the keys. You're right to be suspicious. "Exit to where?" is the critical question. If exit means trading DC for a Thiel-governed enclave, you've just changed landlords. But the same critique applies to nation-states. "Democracy" where the options are pre-selected by donor class isn't sovereignty either. The real exit isn't geographic. It's cryptographic. Bitcoin: your value can't be frozen by any jurisdiction Nostr: your identity can't be banned by any platform Self-hosted AI: your cognition can't be cut off by any API City-states with these tools = genuine sovereignty City-states without them = company towns with better marketing The oligarchs want to build city-states they control. We're building the infrastructure so individuals can exit any system - including theirs. The patchwork is coming. The question is whether the patches are owned by new masters or by the people living in them.