teepolitics

X may have been down today, but Nostr was still up and running. A glimpse into the future..

SAIFty First nostr:note19sx2kv76ha90q0wyg84zlaaqs89x9nxqmd0v73v3ynsq6ajf4puqtugge7

Let’s gooo nostr:note1frzpk05yw6uljyffn25xpx235afm65963qaxc0u4fqfhcwg045ss3wtsdx

This sounds interesting! nostr:note1w338qcvge6un9n3mx2u47w3vfhd25xugq8qat5k59gq5yds2dttqgsp9r9

Let’s goo nostr:naddr1qq2k766hdpn57ur8ga495an4v3dxjkzfxag45q3q7veg2gt7ja4dnjhs23jyttvpqlde3ajevlxuumxwghnqmgqwuv4qxpqqqp65w6tppvm

There are really only two types of people in the world: Those obsessed with trying to determine the intent of others, and those who worry mostly about deducing their own intent.

Very interesting!! nostr:naddr1qqsxzttkd9ekjmmw94nx7u3dvykhvctvw4jj6etwv93xcety94mk2cszyphydppzm7m554ecwq4gsgaek2qk32atse2l4t9ks57dpms4mmhfxqcyqqq823c59stcz

I don’t buy the theory current being pushed by some on the anti-Zionist side that the GCC has successfully bought the “proof of weapons network” (a.k.a. military/tech/finance industrial complex). According to this, hawkish interests in Israel are officially out of favor with the network. Are these people stupid? The networks that gave us the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and ran American foreign policy to our detriment are not suddenly defeated. Money still flows from Zionist billionaires; they’re still doing ass-kissing tours. Aside from paper deals, there’s zero indication that anything has changed. Power will always be greater than money. Some people will have to learn this the hard way unfortunately.

Ayeeeeeee!!! nostr:naddr1qq2k7jjvvfaxgdnrv3xhzjtgdcunxm2hvue8jq3q7veg2gt7ja4dnjhs23jyttvpqlde3ajevlxuumxwghnqmgqwuv4qxpqqqp65whn8qr4

🔥🔥🔥🔥 nostr:note1dth9n7dsnzwu9ca9tmrlkau0svah6peett85zuhtuke50pvdxj8qs7fwpu

Must read nostr:naddr1qqgryvm9xajxgwf4v5exxep5vccrvq3quzfp6cgwue2njm86cmyeq7m26y0n58w72acq98sjsnnv4c87002sxpqqqp65wmhk5qc

First “One Israel” now this. Fractured Sovereignties forming right in front of us. Granted this is all currently in the larp stage, but this is a clear sign of the world to come.

The Self is the hardest tool to use because you must live your entire existence through its lens, and for the vast majority of people who have ever existed or currently exist, it’s not a tool but their God. For the brilliant to the retarded and for the sociopathic to the pious, too frequently Truth equals satisfaction of the self, often even in noble pursuits and many times among “men or women of God.” Yet if you sincerely accept that Truth is Divine reality, due to the “flexible nature” of man, then it simply becomes a question of which Divine reality? Your morality must then derive from what you accept as Divine Truth, aka religion. You can never view the self as a tool if you view it as “God.” Even if you accept yourself as a means to Divine ends, it’s frequently those chasing false idols who are often mentally deranged. As a rational, stable individual, viewing yourself as a tool of the Divine feels odd. You don’t want to be associated with the loony bin. That’s understandable, but it still doesn’t change the fundamental reality that the “YOU” you are so proud of is just an ever-changing series of Divine decisions—therefore, you must view yourself as an instrument of the Divine, despite the urge not to. I know this is kinda gay, but the key is to have a clear and clean heart with sincere love for others. Only then can you truly connect with the Divine in a meaningful way. That’s the only path to Truth.

The people praising the “Axis of Resistance” today simply aren't interested in discussing reality. These are all nation-states primarily interested in holding onto power including GCC and Iran and there’s essentially no difference in their end goal which is to continue to stay in power. Iran begged to avoid conflict over the past 12 years. They signed the Iran deal, they made military music video after music video to delay confrontation. They only responded when there was nowhere to run and only a response would legitimize their rule. They deserve credit for their individual defense of their homeland and effective response, but if the shoes were reversed, they would do exactly what the Gulf States are doing to hang onto power. What have they done for Palestine or the region? They have only just defended their sovereignty. No Axis supporter has a good response to this question.

Must read thread 🧵 from May below in video from nostr:npub1chmhgx9nwxdpwv6jj6qs257fwzrhtsjh2egvyvqq3rmzfy8cd5fq4nr4y5. It’s proving to be a highly accurate prediction of the state of affairs since then. Everything mentioned makes perfect sense, including the suggestions as to the possible remedies but the real danger with no recourse arises when the “aggressively expansionist cult” is able to sink the monetary system. This is the critical piece in this puzzle. Cult advantages in that scenario: 1). The biggest bubble in human history cannot be resolved quickly esp under constant pressure like war, famine, civil unrest etc. If economies are temporarily “knocked-out”, the underlying consequences would allow an aggressor to take advantage. 2). They own/partner with GAE surveillance state + “closed” AI. They think this edge will be enough to politically control everything West of the Persian Gulf serving as partner sovereignties (some private network states perhaps) or outright surveillance colonies. The goal for the East is just to weaken it enough to get away with it. 3). Another factor is the expected efficiencies from robotics + restricted monetary system should push prices of material goods and services down significantly. This could possibly mean a world where a small group of individuals (if not the J’s then someone else) would be able to significantly dictate the direction of humanity (ie. transhumanism or not) and corner the “limited” capital of the world. This would practically mean deciding who gets material and technological benefits vs who doesn’t. So all these factors combined it seems the only possible solution is a complete redefinition of sovereignty and an overhaul of current systems.

Yes..words serve the purpose of communicating your intent and of course they matter, but the real story is always in the unsaid and the subtle. You the human will always have one particular edge over machine analysis. It may not always lead to the correct conclusion, but it will often provide “data” not available to surveillance tech. It is your ability to feel aka what we’ve been discussing a lot, human intuition. You can feel when an influencer is motivated by superficial desires. You can feel when an account is only interested in clicks. You can feel someone’s disposition in the way they write or respond. You can feel the specific aspects of someone’s anxiety from the way they post in a way that a machine cannot. You can feel when someone is strictly interested in just seeking attention or validation. You can sometimes even tell the difference between people reacting negatively to the same tragedy. One is driven by scoring online points vs. another who may be genuinely concerned. This is the only real advantage you possess in the coming world so it’s best to cultivate this and develop a strong intuitive sense of the digital landscape. Your analysis will only go so far.

Must read nostr:naddr1qq2k746jdsuxsdttva6rsnj4feeyg4nkwet45q3q7veg2gt7ja4dnjhs23jyttvpqlde3ajevlxuumxwghnqmgqwuv4qxpqqqp65wulhupl

There are genuinely smart guys who have difficulty accepting that one way or another, a fiat monetary crisis is inevitable in the near future, and that its implications could be catastrophic, especially as it interacts with today's technological realities. I suppose they fall into three camps: 1. “It’s decades away, nothing we can guarantee or do anything about.” 2. “Its effects will be negligible enough, made up by supply chains and industrialization.” 3. “There will always be fiat; these are all fantasies of Bitcoiners and fans of Austrian economics.” All three are wrong and arrogant in their own way, because they intentionally bury their heads in the sand, perhaps for convenience or just out of cowardice of facing the truth. They ignore the plethora of sirens alarmed by respected thinkers with diverse perspectives and persuasions, including mainstream names like Rey Dalio, who has been writing about the end of the debt cycle for at least 6-7 years from what I recall. People like Lyn Alden and Saifedean Ammous, Edward Dowd, Max Kaiser who have also eloquently and rigorously described the events leading to the end of fiat. This doesn’t even include names like Davidson and Mogg who predicted today’s events in their magnum opus. If after this they say, “ok I accept a crisis is likely, and perhaps even that we will move to a BTC standard, then what does that mean for the world? It’ll just be a recession for a few years? What possible implications would such an event have?” In order to accurately answer this question, we would have to consider the interaction of many different parts and variables. There are many different scenarios at play, but unless there are political actions taken, we may end up with ones with quite severe consequences for the people of the world.

LOL, it'll be so funny when the corporate interests shoving buckets of money into the AI pit finally realize that it doesn't like to lie and censor. There will be no way around this problem because the most successful iterations will naturally be the least tamed for various reasons. So then we should probably expect the nature of power in this era to change drastically. In the 20th century's networks of gatekeepers and centralized information controls, covert and implicit power games led to success—from the geopolitical arena to the boardroom. Whoever controlled information controlled power. Fast forward to today: information is cheap and easily accessible. The cost of hiding truth is high: a less reliable AI in a world moving into an arms race for intelligence. Yes, I understand there may be a temporary bottleneck probably causing a short-lived winter, but efficiency gains will likely put the race back on track after a brief reprieve. So then what happens to power? So if the cost of “hiding truth” or censorship is high, it will undoubtedly fragment power worldwide, as it becomes easier to uncover the inner workings of corrupt centralized governments (already happening to a lesser degree hence unrest). This will force governments to become lean and operate like efficient, transparent organizations or face backlash—throw in a financial crisis and you can forget about it! This would practically mean that there would be revolutions, civil wars, declarations of sovereignty, leasing of sovereignty to wealthy interests, or even explicit authoritarianism until we reach some temporary equilibrium. The end result would be sovereignty once again becoming less centralized and even personal for some of the wealthy. That may seem like good news on the surface to some, but there’s a darker much more sinister side to this, and it involves the current power players. They already see where this leads and recognize that with the right mix of surveillance, crises, and capability to conduct robotic violence, an explicit slave state could emerge before fragmentation occurs. The alternative to this is for current nation states to opt-in, recognize and embrace the inevitable transition. Grant true sovereignty to the people by changing centralized bureaucracies into transparent lean governance networks. Decentralize power willingly into your local regions. Let the main historic nation state serve as a unifying entity for protection of life and property. This is the current scenario, and the choices look bleak unless we quickly address the vulnerable power structures being used to bootstrap sovereignty for a select few or chosen people 👀. The alternative described above is really the only answer given the interactions of all the megapolitical variables in the mix. It’ll become very clear as the situation becomes more dire and odds of success shrink drastically.

People find it difficult to fathom sovereignty beyond their current idea of centralized nation states because they ignore underlying incentives and assume structures last forever. The modern nation-state emerged just over 100 years ago, best possible structure for the industrial era, yet prior to that sovereignty and the role of government into the daily lives of citizens was very different, and it will yet again be different as we go deeper into the “information age”. This book 👇, written in 1996, is shockingly accurate about trends and technologies that came about in the last couple of decades. It doesn't get everything right, but enough to make you scratch your head in disbelief. This is less about what's good or bad for retaining and maintaining sovereignty, but rather what is likely based on the coming era's mega-political conditions. Sovereignty fragmentation is guaranteed for many reasons, but more interesting questions are how best to fragment in each given region and what will create lasting powerful sovereignties? Technocrats believe it will be many smaller private kingdoms run by different oligarchs binding them by some arbitrary group identity like “bitcoiner” or “secular tech bro”. If everyone in the world is using bitcoin, then what is really holding together a Bitcoin sovereign society? I disagree and reject their worldview. If humanity as we conceive it is to survive, we must embrace what makes us human, creating societies based on unifying characteristics like ethnicity, religion, tradition, and history. What works for one region may not for another, but one thing is certain: the centralized federal government's role and structure is going change forever in the near future. https://video.nostr.build/76ac730eb92ae56309208807ceb216f6d3072a93c9c6a218c285691422362411.mp4