National Vulnerability Database CVE-2023-50428
Login to reply
Replies (17)
I can't believe it's been taken this long to be honest.
Is this “the fix” that is coming?
Reporting a ‘vulnerability’ in Bitcoin to a US Government agency? Seriously?
Satoshi would be rolling in his grave
LMAO at the tardedness
I don't think so. All previous vulnerabilities have CVE numbers.
This is so retarded I love it
This all seems incredibly retarded 
I've been saying Inscriptions are taking advantage of a software vulnerability since last March.
Make Inscriptions pay the same price as financial transactions instead of hiding in the signature witness data, saving on 1/4 of the fees and then I'll be happy. They'll be paying just like everyone else. Rgith now, they are not. They're exploiting the system to pay 1/4 of the amount.
It's a joke, what's the government gonna do, make everyone run different software?
Your post is generating a lot of discussion.
Added to the https://nostraco.in/hot feed
Thats exactly what they wanted! With the cve people now have a fear that something is broken.
Honestly this being a CVE is embarrassing for all of us.
Oh damn I didn’t see you had already posted it
can’t the devs do something
What should they do? It’s a valid use case made with valid transactions. Creating a CVE for a setting everyone can change freely is extremely embarrassing
Yeah, but some people will never learn! Bitcoin can not be changed because a person or a group thinks something is spam. That’s why I love Bitcoin, it’s resilient against this bullshit.
