weev's avatar
weev 1 month ago
Even if I assume 100% good faith from Odell and everyone at Primal, the fact is that most of the governments of the world have passed laws making demands of social media infrastructure providers, and force decisions from them on a regular basis. This doesn’t affect Nostr at the present moment because nobody is using it, but in the long-term as they have positioned themselves with the capability to censor, they will eventually be forced to do so on a regular basis if Nostr is not a failure. Even if Primal is not currently censoring people or manipulating eyeballs (which I have seen multiple attestations from people I respect who say otherwise), building a centralized service with the capability to censor in the first place should be met with deep contempt and mistrust.

Replies (1)

well, yes. but they're still going to exist, and that's okay. the problem isn't "centralized services that use nostr data", it's that primal is one and it dominates the marketshare, therefore the most common nostr experience is centralized this is a similar problem to the most common bitcoin experience being custodial, and the answer isn't "lecture people on why that's bad", it's to build better distributed tools. this is why i have spent significant time and energy on bitcoindeposits.net analogously, the solution is probably to make self hosted options like iris.to better. to build distributed caching relays. etc. the problem is that building these costs money, and money likes centralization and defends itself, and so funds things in line with its interests, like primal and spark there are no good answers here. funding open source has always been miserable. a long time ago i had the opportunity to ask stallman about this, and his reply was that how the software gets built wasn't his problem. at the individual level it's true, but it doesn't solve the problem