View quoted note → The issue with WoS is you never had your own channel state. The reason it seemed to work so well is that they managed their node and supported a ledger for the accounts. There was nothing magical or special about what they did. You were implicitly trusting WoS with your funds and for them to be honest. @npub1mutn...23vg or @ZEUS, or Pheonix are non-custodial solutions where you run your own node/wallet and are not trusting a third party with your funds. I don't believe that @Wallet of Satoshi will be doing the same. Maybe, but they should do what Breez did and support a more distributed/decentralized approach.