Not sure why you think he'll listen. All he's done is mock those who call him out on this and he has given no logical or rational explanation as to why BIP 177 will cause a reduction in confusion and help promote understanding of bitcoin. This false narrative he's trying to push seems like just another corporate manipulation tactic he's using to help promote Bitkey, which is already getting a fairly large amount of negative reception. Also, saying that the implementation of this particular line of thought will make it easier for others to understand bitcoin just shows how little faith he has in human intelligence.

I thought you were referring to the seedless is safer phrase. Now you are talking about BIP 177... ? Are the two related? I haven't done my homework but just in passing I think I am getting the BIP 177 is the proposal to replace sats with Bitcoin's? Or what is it bits? bitties? I personally don't have a strong attachment to either way. Intuitively though I am feeling having Bitcoin become an ubiquitous phrase used in the lexicon of people in their daily transacting might be better for Bitcoin... 🤷🏻‍♀️ And our daily transacting doesn't involve purchases over $100k+... But it is full of many small purchases that would be priced in satoshis. (Is that the argument anyways). Why are you so passionate about this? What's your take? Every corporation gets to have failed products, perhaps. And it makes sense that they will do their best to make it survive and hopefully thrive. But how are the two related?