1. They should naturally go high with more and more use as an international settlement layer and decreasing block rewards should be compensated too.
2. Nefarious state actors can nationalise mining and make bogus transactions just to keep the fees from falling. All the extra transaction fee goes to the miner but that is state controlled.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
2 is not certain at all. That leaves the very real risk of a competing miner taking your transaction fees unless you think a nation can control the vast majority of hash power. Even then there’s a statistically certain loss of funds in relation to the percentage of hash power they don’t control. Are you sure they can actually afford this loss?