This is purely rhetorical and farcical.
You could substitute Litecoin for Bitcoin and the agruments would be identical.
The entire paper is one Equivocation Fallacy after another with some physics words (many times misused) thrown in.
Login to reply
Replies (8)
I said it a bit differently.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Where's the paper? I want to check it out. Don't want to listen to the pod after reading this take, I suspect I'll be done with it in three minutes.
X (formerly Twitter)
calle (@callebtc) on X
This is so fucking embarrassing.
Bitcoin is a 1.6T USD asset.
While the entire world is sending their best experts in cryptography and quantum p...
"Bitcoin philosophers" gone completely off the rails.
nail on head. its like having a wank with long words.
you dont need to go to a lab to test yiur hypothesis, just buy a bitaxe