Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 7
Generated: 17:13:27
Cats are obligate carnivores. We are not. Survival is one thing, but in most civilized societies it’s not a necessity, it’s a choice. And that choice—and this kind of post—is a long way from the way Native Americans honored and revered the animals they sacrificed so they could live.
2025-11-28 00:40:07 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (7)

In most Asian countries yes, in some no. It’s interesting how different cultures give different animals a pass, isn’t it? Japan reveres the Nara deer like sacred beings, India does the same with cows—yet in other places those same animals are food, no questions asked. Most Americans who wouldn’t think twice about killing a deer would be appalled at the idea of eating a kangaroo—yet you can buy roo meat at Woolworths in Australia. It’s wild how a kitten is family, a cow is sacred, a kangaroo is majestic, a deer is revered—yet somewhere else each one is just meat for slaughter.
2025-11-28 01:07:14 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓ Reply
💯 No judgement, no moral rules not to eat meat. Just noticing that our way of eating meat is 1) disconnected from life. In most cases the appreciation, the gratitude for that life taken to energize our own is simply not there. No deep-felt honoring rituals. It shows a lack of sensitivity, of love for creation as a whole, and 2) indeed not necessary for survival. It may be healthy (when kept naturally) under our current scientific health criteria. But these change. Advanced yogis or meditators testify that eating meat, i.e. more complex life forms, lowers sensitivity, and with it deeper awareness to see behavior patterns that prevent us from being in love with ourselves and creation. The choice is always with us. The consequences follow.
2025-11-28 04:00:26 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply