BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 2 months ago
My view is that the Bitcoin devs or contributers who voted in favor of fixing the inscription spam exploit are not compromised. Also those who voted against OP_RETURN change from 80 to 100 000 Bytes. Luke. Leo and Mechanic for example have good faith. Nick Szabo too. Its true that I don't make strict difference between the 5 maintainers or the rest of the contributors. If below is the correct current list I am not sure only for Hennadii Stepanov. All the rest I consider compromised because of their actions and their communications. "Andrew Chow, Hennadii Stepanov, Michael Ford, Marko Falke, and Gloria Zhao" But in addition to them Peter Todd, Sjors, Antoine, Murch, Peter Wuille, jb55, Jameson Lopp, Benthecarman and others are compromised as well.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
See the compromised Core devs who rejected Luke's PR that fixes inscription spam. They are the bad actors (the NACKers) They revealed themselves with their public comments on OP_RETRUN being dishonest and manipulative. The guys that ACKed are the good guys we have. image https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187 Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →

Replies (1)

That makes sense. The reason I focus on the maintainers is that all of the compromised devs in the world doesn't do squat unless someone with commit access is willing to merge their PR's.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
See the compromised Core devs who rejected Luke's PR that fixes inscription spam. They are the bad actors (the NACKers) They revealed themselves with their public comments on OP_RETRUN being dishonest and manipulative. The guys that ACKed are the good guys we have. image https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187 Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →