Cykros's avatar
Cykros psyche_eros@iris.to 2 months ago
That makes sense. The reason I focus on the maintainers is that all of the compromised devs in the world doesn't do squat unless someone with commit access is willing to merge their PR's.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
See the compromised Core devs who rejected Luke's PR that fixes inscription spam. They are the bad actors (the NACKers) They revealed themselves with their public comments on OP_RETRUN being dishonest and manipulative. The guys that ACKed are the good guys we have. image
GitHub
datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying by luke-jr · Pull Request #28408 · bitcoin/bitcoin
Updates -datacarriersize to be effective with newer datacarrying styles.
 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187 Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →
↑ Parent

Replies (1)

BitcoinIsFuture's avatar
BitcoinIsFuture 2 months ago
Yes that is true. But I also notice that contributes can vote and it seems that their vote counts or at least in the cases where it favours the maintainers ... Because we have seen double standards too. Exactly the inscription fix was rejected by compromised Core devs, achow101 in particular, as being "controversal" but OP_RETURN change was accepted by them as if it is not controversal. Absolute double standard clowns. image Here, its the same link from the vote screenshot
GitHub
datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying by luke-jr · Pull Request #28408 · bitcoin/bitcoin
Updates -datacarriersize to be effective with newer datacarrying styles.
↑