Everyone talking about OP_RETURN but nobody talking about witness data is pretty wild.
The irony is that with the current PR, Core devs might actually push everyone to switch to Knots, which limits witness data to 400kb (which is what actually matters to block current abuses) and OP_RETURN to 42 bytes (which does nothing).
Core would have more credibility IMO to increase OP_RETURN size (opening up the design space for prunable metadata ledger use — way better than what’s currently happening) if they paired it with a witness data limit in the same PR.
Replies (11)
Bien dicho
Exactly, that's how you know they're full of shit, they're not even open to discussing that.
Core Devs credibility=0
Yeah not doing themselves any favors
The core developers this time managed communication very badly by making fun of the whole community
Well known devs and BlackRock ETFs won't go hand in hand. They want a say and they get their say.
Adversarial thinkers left Bitcoin almost a decade ago. Reaping what you saw will bring some natural healing, that will come at the cost of a new shism. It's necessary.
Glad Monero devs are anonymous
Glad Monero has distributed CPU mining with p2p pools
Glad Monero has long-term incentives without fee markets
Glad Monero has incentives for running nodes
Glad Monero has default privacy
Glad Monero has the biggest p2p DEX
Glad Monero has close to 100% self custody
Glad Monero owns free markets
Eric FJ 🪬⚡️
Everyone talking about OP_RETURN but nobody talking about witness data is pretty wild.
The irony is that with the current PR, Core devs might actually push everyone to switch to Knots, which limits witness data to 400kb (which is what actually matters to block current abuses) and OP_RETURN to 42 bytes (which does nothing).
Core would have more credibility IMO to increase OP_RETURN size (opening up the design space for prunable metadata ledger use — way better than what’s currently happening) if they paired it with a witness data limit in the same PR.
View quoted note →
I didn’t see the making fun of people part- do you have a reference or can you explain?
I heard a podcast of an Italian dev core who said that in private chats it was implied that the community doesn't know anything compared to them and therefore the decision was up to them. I don't have any proof 🤷♂️
Elitist mentality doesn’t surprise me.
…Also the community only finally waking up after an action like this also doesn’t surprise me lol.
Would not surprise me one bit. This is the same attitude central planers have. The population is dumb, so we must govern them. And in the process they end up doing the dumbest shit imaginable.
🤷♂️🤷♂️
